Sunday, May 23, 2010

istockphoto vs shutterstock

Hello readers!

Today I wanted to give a quick update on my microstock earnings through these two companies. Please keep in mind this is based on my own experiences... and "your mileage may vary" as they often say. With that disclaimer added, let's jump into my thoughts so far on these two companies when compared side by side.

So far, based on my own numbers, Shutterstock seems like the clear winner by a landslide. Not only has it been considerably more difficult to have images accepted at istockphoto (images that at dreamstime are doing quite well) but of those that have been accepted, I have been little return when compared to Shutterstock. I manage to obtain more approved images at Shutterstock, that also sell faster, and more frequently. The upload process is also quite easy at shutterstuck (much more so than istockphoto, unless you use the third-party API called "DeepMeta", which helps put them on par).

My vote? Goes to Shutterstuck, hands down, for the best microstock website to upload your images to.

Friday, May 7, 2010

Camera returned from Canon, Repaired?



If you've been following along with my Canon 7D Auto focus woes you'll know that I recently had to send it in to Canon for that autofocus that was *say* off base, in my opinion, along with a bit of vertical noise banding even at iso 100.

Posted located here: Canon 7D Focus Issues?

I received the camera back a few days ago and have been running tests to see if there was improvement. The Canon facility wrote that they cleaned the CMOS sensor and calibrated the autofocus. With high hopes I ran it through a gamut of tests that I could imagine.

Conclusions?

Well, the focus is DEFINITELY better. I can hit accurate focus over 90% of the time based on my tests (100 shots, only 7 out of focus). For that series I was using an envelope, printed with text, at 4to 5 yards of distance, using all three of my lenses. my 50mm, my 50-250mm, and my 28-132mm.

With all three, even at the lowest zoom (50mm for the 50-250m and 28mm for the 28-132mm) I hit consistent focus, 33 shots with each lens to make a full 100 shots.

It was broad daylight, and an aperature of 5.6 which is perfect for most of these lenses due to the lower f-stop breaking point of the Canon 7D (5.6 or so, versus the usual 8).

I have to test the noise banding I was seeing before, but I have to wait for a bright day with blue skies to really get a good test shot, no luck so far.

I would report that IF you have a camera that is consistently missing its autofocus mark by just a hair, try a few things:

1). Try a different lens. That lens may be uncalibrated or may have USM issues, it is worth ruling out the possibility that the lens is at fault.

2). If it is the focus on 2 or 3 different lenses then I suggest you try to remove the batteries (Note, I said batterieS... there are two in the unit, the true battery and the clock/time/settings battery). There have been reports online that removing both for 30 minutes at least would reset the camera and for some units seems to have fixed the focus issue.

3). Make sure it is not user error. I'm going to assume that if you are buying a Canon 7D, you are passed the point of learning what your camera can and cannot do and how it works. But, regardless, make sure you have a shutterspeed that is appropiate, make sure you have the right focus points selected (Point, is my recommendation, always Point, never Zone AF unless its a sports event or a fast moving object). The diffraction limit is also important, most lenses only allow 6-11 fstops for sharp pictures, after that you will actually lose quality. It is better explained on page 2 of this posting: Sharp images Canon 7D - Diffraction.
You can also use the lens MTF charts/graphs to decide where your particular lens is the sharpest, those can be found here: Photozone Lens List.

4). If you have checked the above, done your tests on tripods or hand held (at acceptable settings, mind you) and consistently seem to get missed shots, I would send it in. It'll cost you 30$ or so to ship it due to placing the insurance on the unit, but... well worth it, for a working camera.

An important additional note: Make sure you are NOT confusing out of focus with soft. The Canon 7D produces images that are considerably "softer" due to the high pixel count. These images, although apparently unsharp, respond well to post sharpening. If you run sharpening in post, and the image improves and is "now in focus" then auto-focus is NOT your issue. What you are seeing are soft images, due to the high pixel count of the Canon 7D. There is really no good way to change that, aside from setting the camera to only shoot at 15Megapixels in order to test the theory. So I would highly recommend you sharpen in post, to see if your images improve significantly. You can also set the camera to shoot both Raw + Jpeg and ensure that the incamera sharpening for jpegs is set to standard or higher. Then compare the jpegs to the raws. If you find the jpegs to be consistently "sharp and infocus" but raw files are not, then it is NOT a focus issue, but the softness exhibited by the pixel density.

Thursday, May 6, 2010

A small post on Tutorials

I found this website with a few tutorials and honestly found them to be useful for photoshop manipulations. Videos can be found at:

http://library.creativecow.net/tutorials/adobephotoshop/cs4

The info may already be known by most, but if you find even one topic that you had not mastered yet, then it may be worth while. Be sure to check it out, you know the old saying "you learn something new everyday", well... here's your chance.

Also be sure to check out my overview of microstock sites, with pros and cons for each at:

http://microstuck.blogspot.com/p/photographers-guide-to-microstock.html

The page is especially geared towards photographers trying to get into the microstock world

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Video Microstock? iPad? and best sites for Video

Microstock, like many fields, has evolved. Video is now a larger component of microstock then it was even just a year ago. But is this a gimmick? A temporary evolution that will soon falter in favor of traditional photo based microstock? It's difficult to say, but I personally believe that video stock is the future of microstock.

Lets put 2 and 2 together here. Now more than ever the world is progressing towards a perpetually online state of information. Consider this... newspapers, magazines, and book sales are all on decline while the sales in paid RSS feeds, App Content, and E-books is on the rise. New platforms are being released almost daily to compliment the rise in new formats (iPad, Netbooks, E-readers, Tablet PCs, etc). Just consider the release of the newest gadget to hit the streets... The iPad.

The iPad will, through apps, take magazines and newspapers to a different level. A level where images no longer need to be static, and advertisements no longer need to be photo based. Imagine reading a magazine that you purchased through the app store... flipping the pages casually, and seeing advertisements, previously still photos, in movement as videos. That may very well be the future of "print" media.

So does this mean that you should drop your full frame and grab a camcorder? Probably not. Microstock photos will still be very useful for a number of media that cannot be virtualized, such as pamphlets, business cards, poster boards (although we all know this will eventually just be flat panel, flexible LCD screens with video... dont we now), and such. What this does mean is that those that DO have video capable cameras should consider jumping in as soon as they can.

Places to jump in:
-Shutterstock
-iStockphoto
-pond5

Places to Avoid:
-Fotolia

Reasoning: Shutterstock/iStockphoto/pond5 all allow for VERY competative pricing, where the contributor can make as much as 30$ a clip (per download). Fotolia however is still running video prices, as if they were photos... paying pennies on the dollar, with little traffic or sales to really offset the price difference. As such, I'd avoid fotolia like the plague for Video. My 2 cents, I hope they helped :) Click the links/advertisements on the side if you found anything useful so far!